Are Modern Jews Descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob?
Dr. Thomas Ice
Some people
contend that modern Jews do not have the blood of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in
their veins. They contend that
modern Jews, whether in or out of the land of Israel have no genetic basis from
which to claim that they are Jews, let alone the chosen descendants of Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob. Some say that
since they are not true Jews then they are not descendants of those who were
scattered across the globe in a.d. 70 then they cannot return
to what they never really left, which is the land of Israel. Is this true or just another effort to
disinherit GodÕs ancient chosen people?
Are Modern Jews Frauds?
The conviction
that modern Jews are fraudulent has been clearly expressed by Presbyterian
replacement theologian James B. Jordan.[i] ÒWith the passing away of the Old
Covenant, there is no longer any such a thing as a Jew in the Biblical sense,Ó
declares Jordan. I wonder, ÒIs
there any other sense in which one could be a Jew except for the biblical
sense?Ó ÒUnless by ÔTrue JewsÕ we
mean Christians. There is no
covenant, and therefore there is no nation, no Ôrace.ÕÓ[ii] Nowhere does the New Testament call
Gentile Christians ÒTrue Jews,Ó ÒJews,Ó ÒIsraelÓ or any such term. New Testament believers are called the
seed of Abraham because he was the father of those who believe. Abraham was the only Gentile in the
history of the world who became a Jew or Israelite since the Jewish race
descended from him, Isaac and Jacob.
Thus, all Christian believers in the current church
age, whether Jew or Gentile are offspring from the spiritual seed of Abraham
(Rom. 4:1–5; Gal. 3:6–7, 14, 16–18). Abraham is both the father of physical
Israel known as the Jews and father of spiritual descendants, that is, everyone
who believes in Jesus as the Messiah, whether Jew or Gentile (Gen. 15:6).
Jordan makes one
of the most outlandish statements possible on this topic when he declares: ÒIt
is entirely possible that there is not one drop of AbrahamÕs blood in any
modern Jew.Ó[iii] One might think that only a radical
Islamic terrorist would publicly write such things, but Jordan is an
Evangelical Christian. He does not
stop with the preceding comment, he continues with the
following pontification:
Modern Jews are a separate nation of people with a self-identity, spread out among many other nations. The closest analogy to them are the Gypsies. The only difference between Modern Jews and Gypsies is that the Modern Jews claim to have a relation to the Bible Jews, a claim I maintain is false. . . . Modern Jews think of themselves as Jews, but they are not Jews. They are counterfeits of Biblical Jews. I say this not to disparage them, but to be accurate.[iv]
JordanÕs
ÒscholarshipÓ leads him to believe that todayÕs Jews (he even coins a special
term for the Jews of today—Òmodern JewsÓ) are fraudulent, merely posing
as Jews. History would be totally
different if Hitler had thought this way, or if the Muslims of today would come
to learn of JordanÕs discovery.
ÒModern Jews are people who choose to think of themselves as descendants
of Israel,Ó insists Jordan.[v]
It is the Bible
that divides mankind into Jew and Gentile, denoting oneÕs descent by
birth. One may repudiate the
religious aspects of Judaism, but they cannot escape the genealogical fact that
they were born within the Jewish race.
The Nazis during the Holocaust made little distinction between deeply
religious Jews and secular Jews, or even Jews that had converted to
Christianity. They killed them all
when they had the opportunity. The
same is true today. The Muslims
kill Jews today whether they are religious or secular. It does not matter to them.
The Biblical Definition of Jewishness
The Bible is
GodÕs inerrant revelation and is the supreme authority on any matter to which
it speaks. The Bible speaks clearly
and loudly concerning the issue of Jewishness. Scripture teaches that those who are descendants
of the Abraham line make up the nation we call Israel (Gen. 12:1–3;
13:15–16; 15:4–5; 26:2–5, 24; 28:13–15). Jewishness is a nationality based upon
descent, whether one obeys God or not.
Arnold Fruchtenbaum correctly summaries Israel as, Òall descendants of
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, also known as the Jews, the Jewish people, Israelites,
Hebrews, etc. The term is not
limited to the present political and national state in the Middle East, which
is merely a part of the whole; nor is it limited to those who adhere to the
religion of Judaism only.Ó[vi]
The broader term Israel Òappears over two thousand times
in the Old Testament and seventy times in the New Testament. This term refers to a specific ethnic
group . . . The name YisraÕel
was conferred on Jacob (Gen. 32:28), AbrahamÕs grandson, and means Ôsolider of
GodÕ or ÔGod persists.ÕÓ[vii] Israel began as a patriarchal clan when
Abraham came out of Babylon, went to Egypt and 400 years later returned to the
Promised Land as a true nation of two or three million. Yet Jordan imagines a problem in that
Israel did indeed incorporate into the nation many non-Jews down through her
history.
[viii]
Is this supposed
to be a problem? Over time it
appears that the Gentiles who became part of AbrahamÕs clan integrated with his
descendants so that by the time of the Exodus that nation was indeed
Jewish—descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. At least this is the view that the Bible
takes toward this matter. The Lord promised Abraham: ÒTo your descendants I will give
this landÓ (Gen. 12:7). ÒAnd I will
make your descendants as the dust of the earth; so that if anyone can number
the dust of the earth, then your descendants can also be numberedÓ (Gen.
13:16). ÒAnd He took him outside
and said, ÔNow look toward the heavens, and count the stars, if you are able to
count them.Õ And He said to him,
ÔSo shall your descendants beÕÓ (Gen. 15:5). ÒAnd God said to Abram, ÔKnow for
certain that your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs,
where they will be enslaved and oppressed four hundred yearsÕÓ (Gen.
15:13). ÒMoreover, the angel of the
Lord said to her, ÔI will greatly
multiply your descendants so that they shall be too many to countÕÓ (Gen.
16:10). ÒAnd I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after
you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you
and to your descendants after youÓ (Gen. 17:7). There are many more similar passages
indicating that God thought of those in the line of descent as offspring of the
Abrahamic line.
Even though the
Jews surely have intermarried with Gentiles that does not invalidate their
Jewishness any more than intermarriage that was practiced in the Old Testament
did not invalidate their Jewishness.
Jesus Himself had a number of Gentiles within His genealogical line, yet
He was certainly Jewish. In the
time of the New Testament these people were still known as Jews—the
descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Jesus referred to the residents of Israel in His day as Jews. When reading the New Testament, there
does not appear to be a problem identifying who the Jews were ChristÕs
day. The notion that Jews cannot
have the blood of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob flowing
through their veins is purely one manufactured by those with an
anti-Semitic bias.
Since there was
about a two thousand year period from the call of Abraham until the time of
Christ and Jesus referred to the residents of Israel as Jews, then we have a
precedent to do so today. It has
been about another two thousand years since the time of Christ until our
present day. If the descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were considered Jews after two
thousand years by Jesus in His day, then why should they not be considered
descendents of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob today, after another two thousand years
have passed? In fact, the last two
thousand years have seen some Gentile intermarriage, but for the most part, the
nations have shut up the Jewish people into their own ghettos and not allowed
them to intermingle with Gentiles.
Even though an unintended result by perpetrators, anti-Semitism has helped
to keep the blood of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob flowing through the veins
of modern Jewry. Also, those Jews
that have repeatedly married Gentiles have lost their Jewish identity and are
no longer part of the Jewish race and indeed are not considered Jews after a
while. Ruthven correctly notes the
following:
The tradition of identifying a Jew as one whose mother was Jew may represent an attempt to preserve the genetic identity of Jews in the Diaspora. Before that, Jews were those whose fathers were Jews. During the dispersion, oppression of the Jews made it difficult to know who someoneÕs father was, due to the frequent rape of Jewish women by their oppressors, in times of war and peace. Conversions to Judaism, of course, complicate this purely genetic model somewhat. But the children of these concerts will marry Jews and raise their children to do the same. So Jewish genes soon predominate.[ix]
The Bible is the ultimate authority and it is significant to realize that both the Old and New Testaments speak of a specific destiny for the Jewish people in a day future to our own time. Maranatha!
ENDNOTES
[i] James B. Jordan is a Presbyterian replacement theologian coming from the preterist, postmillennial and covenant theology orientation.
[ii] James B. Jordan, ÒThe Future of Israel ReexaminedÓ (Part 1), Biblical Horizons (No. 27; July 1991), p. 4.
[iii] Jordan, ÒFuture of IsraelÓ (Part 1), p. 4.
[iv] Jordan, ÒFuture of IsraelÓ (Part 1), p. 4.
[v] James B. Jordan, ÒChristian Zionism and Messianic Judaism,Ó in The Sociology of the Church: Essays in Reconstruction (Tyler, TX: Geneva Ministries, 1986), p. 183.
[vi] Arnold Fruchtenbaum, Israelology: The Missing Link In Systematic Theology, rev. ed. (Tustin, CA: Ariel Ministries Press, 1992), p. 2
[vii] Ronald E. Diprose, Israel in the development of Christian thought (Rome: Istitutio Biblico Evangelico Italiano, 2000), p. 7.
[viii] Jordan, ÒChristian Zionism,Ó p. 177.
[ix] Jon Mark Ruthven, The Prophecy That Is Shaping History: New Research on EzekielÕs Vision of the End (Fairfax, VA: Xulon Press, 2003), pp. 40–41.
