Populating The Millennium
Dr. Thomas Ice
A
problem generated by the viewpoint of premillennial, posttribulationism is as
follows: ÒWho will populate the millennium with mortals, if the rapture occurs
in association with the second coming?Ó
This is a problem that has never been answered by any
posttribulationist. In fact, very
few posttribulationists even attempt to answer this problem. Instead, most just ignore it.
The Problem Stated
All
modern-day premillennialists believe the Bible teaches that Jews and Gentiles
will survive the seven-year tribulation and enter the thousand-year kingdom or
the millennium in their current mortal bodies. Mortals that enter the millennium will
be able to marry and have children, who will then multiply at a rapid rate
since such people will be capable of a thousand-year lifespan, there will be no
poverty, very few people will die during this time, and there will clearly be a
population explosion likely into the billions (Isa. 19:24–24; 65:17–25).
Pretribulationists
have no problem explaining how such a scenario will take place. At the rapture, all
living church age believers will be evacuated to heaven by the Lord. At that split second in history there
will not be one believer upon planet earth. But, shortly after the rapture many
unbelievers will start getting saved.
Since there will be an interval of days, weeks, months, or years between
the rapture and the start of the tribulation, there could be millions of
Christian converts even before the tribulation begins. Further, even more will be converted
during the tribulation itself, meaning that there could be hundreds of millions
of believers by the middle of the tribulation. Even though a high percentage of
believers will be martyred during the tribulation, there will still be many
that survive this time and are then ready to enter the millennium in their
mortal bodies. This issue is not a
problem for pretribulationism.
However,
for posttribulationism this issue is in my opinion an unsolvable problem. If the posttribulational view that
rapture occurs in conjunction with the second coming is accepted, then the
rapture event will result in all believers alive at ChristÕs return being
transformed from their current mortal state to immortality via a translation to
heaven. Since all unbelievers will
be judged or killed at ChristÕs return (Matt. 13:30, 36–43, 47–50;
24:36–41; 25:30, 31–46), thus, there will be no mortals left to
enter into the thousand-year reign of Christ. For example in Matthew 25:31–46,
the sheep and goat judgment that will take place
shortly after the second coming, how will any goats (unbelievers) make it into
the kingdom? After placing the
goats on the left, the text is clear when it says, ÒThen He will also say to
those on His left, ÔDepart from Me, accursed ones, into the eternal fire which
has been prepared for the devil and his angels;Õ . . . And these will go away
into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal lifeÓ (Matt. 25:41,
46). It is not surprising that very
few posttribulationists do not even attempt to answer this issue in their
writings.
Robert Gundry
Scholar,
Robert Gundry, is one of the few to attempt an explanation of how premillennial
posttribulationism might handle this biblical issue. Gundry strives to avoid the clear
implications of his position by attempting interpretative gymnastics in the
following way: First, he says, Òthe 144,000 will
include both men and women who will populate and replenish the millennial
kingdom of Israel. If they will resist
the Antichrist but remain unbelievers in Christ until the second coming, the
reason for their sealing at once becomes apparent: their unconverted state will
require special protection from the wrath of God and the persecution of the
Antichrist.Ó[i] Second, based upon Matthew 24:40, 41
(relating to Gentiles), Gundry believes it is merely an assumption that sees
Òthe destruction of the entire unsaved population of the earth.
. . . a partial destruction would leave the remaining
unsaved to populate the millennial earth.Ó[ii] Third, Òthe judgment in Matthew 25 will
take place after the millennium, the unregenerate who survive the tribulation
and second coming will go into the millennium in their natural bodies.Ó[iii]
The 144,000
GundryÕs
view that the 144,000 Jewish witnesses will provide Jewish mortals for the
millennium because they were sealed, but not be saved until they see Jesus
during His descent to the Mount of Olives (Zech. 12:10)[iv] is an amazing
stretch of anything in the biblical text concerning this matter (Rev.
7:1–8; 14:1–5).
Problems with this view start with the problem that Gundry has to make
the 144,000, not Jewish men only, as the text demands, but men and women, so
that there will be women in order to produce Jewish prodigy in the
millennium. Revelation 14:4a says,
ÒThese are the ones who have not been defiled
with women, for they have kept themselves chaste.Ó The 144,000 must be Jewish men, based
upon that passage. Thus, even if
they entered the millennium in mortal bodies, there would be no Jewish women to
bear their offspring.
Further,
Revelation 7:3 says, ÒDo not harm the earth or the sea or the trees, until we
have sealed the bond-servants of our God on their foreheads.Ó These are servants of God, not of the
Antichrist. It is hard to imagine
that as unbelievers they resist the mark of the beast, remain virgins
throughout the tribulation, and are given a new song to sing in heaven
(14:3). Also, Revelation 14:4c
says, ÒThese have been purchased from among men as first fruits to God and to
the Lamb.Ó Why are the 144,000 said
to be sealed upon their foreheads before some tribulation judgments occur (7:1)
if they are unbelievers throughout the tribulation, while the destiny of
unbelievers is clearly noted in Revelation 14:9–11, which will be the
eternal torment of the lake of fire.
The only reason GundryÕs view could make sense would be if one is trying
to avoid pretribulational implications and support posttribulationism.
Judgment of Gentiles
Virtually
all premillennialists place the sheep and goat judgment of Matthew 25 at the
end of the tribulation since it makes sense that it follows ChristÕs second
coming in the previous chapter.
Thus, it makes sense that this judgment is one that precedes the beginning of ChristÕs Kingdom, which is the millennium. ÒThen the King will say to those on His
right [sheep], ÔCome, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom
prepared for you from the foundation of the worldÕÓ (Matt. 25:34). However, Gundry equates the sheep and
goat judgment of Matthew 25 with the Great White Throne judgment of Revelation
20, which does occur at the end of ChristÕs millennial kingdom.
Gundry takes the
term ÒnationÓ in Matthew 25:32 to refer to all peoples, including Jews.[v] ÒAnd all the
nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one
another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats.Ó GundryÕs view does not fit the Matthew
25 context since the focus of the judgment there relates to how one treated Òthese
brothers of Mine.Ó ÒAnd the King will answer and say to
them, ÔTruly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of these
brothers of Mine, even the least of them, you did it
to MeÕÓ (Matt. 25:40). ÒThese
brothers of MineÓ are Jewish believers who have been
persecuted during the just completed tribulation period. So the nations (Greek=ethnos) must refer to Gentiles only in
that context. In contrast with the
Great White Throne where all unbelievers (Jew and Gentile alike) are judged for
their rejection of Jesus as the Messiah and judged according to oneÕs works
(Rev. 20:11–15).
A number of other
factors prohibit GundryÕs view: The Greek word ethnos Òis normally and most frequently used of non-Jewish people.Ó[vi] The few times when ethnos is used to refer to Israel, it occurs in the singular, while
the plural use always refers to the Gentile nations. When the definite article is used, as is
the case in Matthew 25:32, it always refers to Gentiles. The phrase Òall the nationsÓ occurs
twice in the preceding context of Matthew 24 (9, 14) and refers to Gentiles.[vii] These factors support the traditional
understanding of the sheep and goat judgment occurring at the second coming, a
view that renders GundryÕs view as impossible.
Unbelievers To Enter The Kingdom?
GundryÕs view requires that unbelievers enter into the millennial kingdom since all believers will be raptured and resurrected at the second coming. He says the pretrib belief that all unbelievers will be judged and totally eliminated from entering into the millennial kingdom is an assumption.[viii] It is not an assumption if specific texts say what one believes.
Look
at what some of the key Scripture passages say. ÒThe Son of Man will send forth His
angels, and they will gather out of His kingdom all stumbling blocks, and those
who commit lawlessness, and will cast them into the furnace of fire; in that
place there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then the righteous will shine forth as
the sun in the kingdom of their FatherÓ (Matt. 13:41–43). ÒSo it will be at the end of the age; the
angels shall come forth, and take out the wicked from among the righteous, and
will cast them into the furnace of fire; there shall be weeping and gnashing of
teethÓ (Matt. 13:49–50). It
is clear in these contexts that what the righteous are entering into is the
millennial kingdom. It is equally
clear that the unrighteous are being prevented from entering into the
millennial kingdom as well.
The issue of populating the millennium remains an unanswered problem for posttribulationist. GundryÕs heroic effort only results in a distortion of the plain reading of the Bible. This issue remains a powerful argument in favor of the pre-trib rapture position. Maranatha!
ENDNOTES
[i] Robert H. Gundry, The Church and The Tribulation (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1973), pp. 82–83.
[ii] Gundry, Church and Tribulation, p. 137.
[iii] Gundry, Church and Tribulation, p. 164.
[iv] Gundry, Church and Tribulation, p. 83.
[v] Gundry, Church and Tribulation, pp. 168–71.
[vi] Steven L. McAvoy, ÒA Critique of Robert GundryÕs Posttribulationism,Ó (ThD dissertation at Dallas Theological Seminary, 1986), p. 175.
[vii] McAvoy, ÒGundryÕs Posttribulationism,Ó pp. 176–77.
[viii] Gundry, Church and Tribulation, pp. 166–67.
